About your Search

20121114
20121114
STATION
CNN 6
CNNW 6
CSPAN2 3
CNBC 2
CSPAN 2
FBC 2
KQEH (PBS) 2
MSNBC 2
MSNBCW 2
KNTV (NBC) 1
KPIX (CBS) 1
WGN (CW) 1
WUSA (CBS) 1
LANGUAGE
English 33
Search Results 0 to 32 of about 33 (some duplicates have been removed)
on wednesday. i think everybody needs to catch their breath. i'm sure governor romney is spending time with his family. my hope is that before the end of the year that we have a chance to get down and sit down and talk. there are certain aspects that i think could be very helpful. to give you one example, i do think he did a terrific job running the olympics. that skill said of trying to figure out how we make something work better applied to the federal government. i think there are a lot of ideas that i do not think our partisan ideas but are just smart ideas about how we can make the federal government more customer friendly. how can we make sure we are consolidating programs that are duplicative. he presented some ideas during the course of the campaign that i actually agree with. it would be interesting to talk to him about something like that. there may be at the is that he has with respect to
thing that everybody understood, was a big difference between myself and mr. romney, it was when it comes to how we reduce our deficit, i argued for a balanced, responsible approach and part of that included making sure that the wealthiest americans pay a little bit more. i think every voter out there understood that was an important debate and the majority of voters agreed with me. by the way, more voters agreed with me on this issue than voted for me. so we've got a clear majority of the american people who recognize if we're going to be serious about deficit reduction we have to do it in a balanced way. the only question now is, are we going to hold the middle class hostage in order to go ahead and let that happen? or can we all step back and say, here's something we agree on, we don't want middle class taxes to go up, let's go ahead and lock that in, that will be good for the economy, it will be good for consumers, it will be good for businesses, it takes the edge off of fiscal cliff, and let's commit ourselves to the broader package of deficit reduction that includes entitle
to anybody. if there was one thing that everybody understood was a big difference between myself and mr. romney, it was when it comes to how we reduce our deficit, i argued for a balanced, responsible approach and part of that included making sure that the wealthiest americans pay a little bit more. i think every voter out there understood that that was an important debate and the majority of voters agreed with me. by the way, more voters agreed with me on this issue than voted for me. so we've got a clear majority of the american people who recognize if we're going to be serious about deficit reduction we've got to do it in a balanced way. the only question now is are we going to hold the middle class hostage in order to go ahead and let that happen, or can we all step back and say, here's something we agree on, we don't want middle class taxes to go up, let's go ahead and lock that in, that will be good for the economy, it will be good for consumers, it will be good for businesses. it takes the edge off the fiscal cliff. and let's also then commit ourselves to the broader package of d
. that it is a socialist agenda. and i think that people in this bubble really did think that romney was certain to win because everybody they knew supported him and opposed obama. it's like the flip side of the old unfair joke about pauline kael who said, "how could nixon win in '72? everybody i know voted for mcgovern." apparently, she never actually said that. but we know the attitude it exemplifies. the right is now in that bubble. everybody they know hates obama. so how could all these people be voting for obama? >> in the hours leading up to the election, fox news devoted itself to speculation about romney's win. newt gingrich and others were talking about how big the romney landslide was going to be. gingrich thought it would be 300 electoral votes at least. >> i believe the minimum result will be 53-47 romney, over 300 electoral votes, and the republicans will pick up the nate. >> so are you suggesting that they, a conservative propaganda machine, was blindsided by its own ideology? >> i think that is so. and i think we may have seen a tipping point in this election because in all previous elec
presidential rival. listen to this. >> i think everybody needs to catch their breath. i'm sure governor romney is spending some time with his family. and my hope is before the end of the year, though, we have a chance to sit down and talk. there are certain aspects of governor romney's record and his ideas that i think could be very helpful. and, well, to give you one example, i do think he did a terrific job running the olympics. >> then he went on to say there were several other excellent ideas that mitt romney raised during the campaign, worthy of explor exploring, wants to sit down and talk to him. gloria, i thought that was nice of the president to make those comments. don't know how mitt romney will respond, but i assume he's the president of the united states, he was re-elected, romney being a great american as he is will say, i would be happy to do whatever you would like me to do. >> i think if the president reaches out to him to have a discussion it clear mitt romney would have it. i don't think he's got a job in mind for mitt romney, but one of the things the president may have been
. obama was serious for mitt romney? and neil cavuto for food. >> county and. gerri: hello, everybody. i'm gerri willis. tonight, an in-depth look at housing, the state of the market and the opportunities that await , fires and investors. as you no doubt remember, on a rocky road after a bull market in which prices topped out in july 2005, median home values plummed 32%. and some owners saw their prices cut in half. the worst is over. median prices o 16%. home sales just hit a four year high. inventories are at their lowest lel since 2006. foreclosures are declining. it has been a long, hard road for many families to consider their home their bigst investment, and 31 percent of us still owing more than our home is worth, you may be wondering how we can possibly see a silver ng in the housing market. you want more evidence? phoenix arizona, a market that was the poster child for housing problems. the overbuilt domination leading foreclosure, entire neighborhoods abandoned and in disrepair. today prices are up 25% so far, and track to finish up 30%. to be sure that is not as big again as
. if there was one thing everybody understood was a big difference between myself and mr. romney, it was when it comes to how we reduce our deficit, i argued for a balanced responsible approach and part of that included making sure that the wealthiest americans pay a little bit more. >> congressman, the president seemed clear to me. i think the question is how does your colleagues deal with the tea party and far right element in their caucus? do they have enough votes? if you look at the breakdown in congress now, congressman -- and, ezra, i would like your response. you have 233 republicans, 196 democrats. six are still undecided. are there enough republicans to vote with the democrats on a compromise on the president's term in your opinion, congressman? i believe there will be enough votes. they will get it in january. it's a matter of time. we have had billionaires and millionaires too used to getting free stuff. that's to have the most powerful country in the world to call home, the best military and not pay their fair share. they have to pay their fair share and the president said so. th
are serious about it. he zoo tais talking to everybod. he is saying i'm going to talk to everybody. one other thing that i want to say, i was rereading the spees. president obama proposed this idea that then romney also proposed. so this idea has been out there for a while. but if we can agree on that flt that is the most important thing. number one the majority of the american support the position. math actually matters to the american people. >> you were doing so well until those last two points. james, you think i'm nuts? do you think there is not going to be a deal? >> because in all seriousness. after today's labor union meeting. so far i have not heard the labor union meeting. i haven't heard that. you go back to the president's friday statement and it was the campai campaign speech but as you suggest he said more tax revenues, but unfortunately, treasury secretary tim geithner said at the ceo council today you have to raise rates. >> he didn't get the memo. he is a busy guy and a good man. but he did not get the memo to which karen referred to earlier. one more point. james, let me ask
that everybody understood was a big difference between myself and mr. romney it was when it comes to how we reduce our deficit, i argued for a balanced, responsible approach and part of that included making sure that the wealthiest americans pay a little bit more. i think every voter out there understood that that was an important debate, and the majority of voters agreed with me. by the way, more voters agreed with me on this issue than voted for me. we've got a clear majority of the american people who recognize if we're going to be serious about deficit reduction, we've got to do it in a balanced way. the only question now is are we going to hold the middle class hostage medical record to go ahead and let that happen? or can we all step back and say here's something we agree on, we don't want middle class taxes to go up. let's go ahead and lock that in. that will be good for the economy. it will be good for consumers. it will be good for businesses. it takes the edge off the fiscal cliff, and let's also then commit ourselves to the broader package of deficit reduction that includes entit
. i forgot wednesday. so -- i think everybody needs to catch their breath. i'm sure governor romney is spending some time with his family. and my hope is before the even of the year we have a chance to talk. there are certain aspects of governor romney's record and his ideas that i think could be very helpful. and to give one example, i do think he did a terrific job running the olympics. and, you know, that skill set of trying to figure out how do we make something work better apply to the federal government. there are a lot of ideas i doesn't think are partisan ideas but are just smart ideas about how can we make the federal government more customer-friendly. how can we make sure that we are consolidating programs that are duplicates. he presents some ideas during the campaign that it agree with. so it would be interesting to talk to him about that. there may be ideas he has with respect to jobs and growth that can help middle class families. i'm not either prejudging what he's interested in doing, nor am i suggesting i have got to specific assignment. but way want to do is get id
. if there was one thing that everybody understood, was a big difference between myself and mr. mitt romney, when it comes to how we reduce our deficit, i argued for a balanced and responsible approach. part of that included making sure that the wealthiest americans pay a little bit more. i think that every voter out there and understood that that was an important debate. the majority of voters agreed with me. either way, more voters agreed with me on this. we have a clear program that we are going to be serious about deficit reduction, and we have to do it in a balanced way. the only question is are we going to pull the middle-class hostage in order to go ahead and let that happen? or can we all step back and say, here is something we agree on. we don't want the middle-class taxes to go up. let's go ahead and lock them in. that will be good for the economy. it will be good for consumers. it will be good for businesses. it takes the edge off the fiscal cliff. let's also then commit ourselves to the broader package of deficit reduction. that includes entitlement changes and it includes potential t
of this campaign. this shouldn't be a surprise to anybody. this was, if there was one thing that everybody understood was a big difference between myself and mr. romney, it was, when it comes to how we reduce our deficit, i argued for a balanced responsible approach and part of that included making sure that the wealthiest americans pay a little bit more. i think every voter out there understood that was an important debate and the majority of voters agreed with me. by the way, more voters agreed with me on this issue than voted for me. so we've got a clear majority of the american people who recognize if we're going to be serious about deficit reduction we've got to do it in a balanced way. the only question now is, are we going to hold the middle class hostage in order to go ahead and let that happen? or, can we all step back and say, here's something we agree on. we don't want middle class taxes to go up. let's go ahead and lock that in. that will be good for the economy. it will be good consumer, take the edge off the fiscal cliff. and no, let's also then commit ourselves to broader pa
, if there was one thing that everybody understood, was a big difference between myself and mr. romney, it was when it comes to how we reduce our deficit, i argued for a balanced, responsible approach and part of that included making sure that the wealthiest americans pay a little bit more. i think every voter out there understood that that was an important debate. and the majority of voters agreed with me. by the way, more voters agreed with me on this issue than voted for me. we've got a clear majority of the american people who recognize if we're going to be serious about deficit reduction, we have to do it in a balanced way. the only question now is, are we going to hold the middle class hostage in order to go ahead and let that happen? or can we all step back and say here's something we agree on, we don't want middle class taxes to go up. let's go ahead and lock that in. that will be good for the economy. it will be good for consumers. it will be good for businesses. it takes the edge off the fiscal cliff. and let's also then commit ourselves to the broader package of deficit reduction that in
to notice and i'll also point out that paul ryan is the republican in the romney campaign who said look, let's go campaign among black voters, even though they're not voting for us, because if we're the republican party of opportunity for everybody, that's where we ought to be among the part of the economy that needs help the most. >> david, i want to ask you about something else the congressman said today. abc asked him whether or not the president had a mandate. here's what he had to say. >> the president wins 300 some electoral votes, every battleground state with the exception of north carolina. does barack obama now have a mandate? >> i don't think so, because they also re-elected the house republicans, so whether people intended or not, we've got divided government. >> you don't think it's a mandate here? >> i don't, because then they would have put nancy pelosi in charge of the house of representatives. >> david, do you buy that? democrats gain in both the house and the senate. the president won the popular vote, well over 300 electoral votes and by big majorities, they told exit poll
%. the president is saying let's have a balanced approach and then everybody do their fair share. that was put before the public. it was in virtually every speech the president gave. it was opposed by mitt romney. the president won the re- election, and the republicans should listen to what the public has said. they seem fixed on this notion, do not touch rates, do something else, that is often vague. mitt romney said pick a number. you cannot do tax reform that way. basically, we need to avoid the fiscal cliff, we need to make sure middle income taxpayers continue to receive the tax rates they have paid, while upper income tax rates, those should be allowed to expire. host: something else on the table, the expiration of the payroll tax holiday. should that be extended? is it realistic? guest: it would depend on the results of the reports next month. if they are like this last month and it shows considerable job growth, i think the payroll tax provision will expire. if there is a change, we will have to take a look at it. we need to have a balanced approach, look at the facts, see what is goin
of this campaign. i mean, this shouldn't be a surprise to anybody. if there was one thing that everybody understood was a big difference between myself and mr. romney, it was when it comes to how we reduce our deficit, i argued for a balanced responsible approach, in part of that included making sure that the wealthiest americans pay a little bit more. i think every voter out there understood that that was an important debate, and the majority of voters agreed with me. by the way, more voters agreed with me on this issue and voted for me. so we've got a clear majority of the american people who recognize that if we're going to be serious about deficit reduction, we've got to do in a balanced way. the only question now is, are we going to hold the middle-class hostage in order to go ahead and let that happen? or can we all step back and said, here's something we agree on, we don't want middle-class taxes to go up, let's go ahead and lock it in. that will be good for the economy. it will be good for consumers. it would be good for businesses. it takes the edge off the fiscal cliff, and let's also bee
and a matter of tone. the way to grow this for everybody has to have the policies that were enunciated in the plan that mitt romney laid out. we were just not successful getting it to that level. >> do you think that the comments by the senator the comments by todd akin and richard murdoch -- do they carry through to an international level in the polling for the republicans probably? >> yes. [laughter] >> again, hard to measure. but the gender gap that we have on our site, which, by the way, it is not something new this year. the numbers are not in yet. but it probably will be comparable to 2008. i'm not saying it's going. but it is a challenge we face as republicans. and i think those comments exacerbated things. >> in previous cycles, a comment by a senator like that would not have echoed through that remark that's true. whatever stupid thing i say today can have an impact on what happens. every gathering and fundraiser, everything that we saw everything is subject to being repeated on the web. that is something that the candidates need to be aware of. frankly, in 2014, republicans h
. the way to grow this economy and create more jobs an opportunity for everybody is to have policies enunsy eighted in five-point plan mitt romney laid out and we were not successful getting it to that level. >> do you think the comments by the senator, senatorial candidates, todd akin and richard mourdock mattered? did they carry through in national level in polling for republicans broadly? >> yes. again, hard to measure but obviously the gender gap that we have on our side, which by the way persists. it is not something new this year. final numbers i think are not in yet but will probably be comparable to 2008. i'm not saying it is growing but it is a challenge we face as republicans. i think those comments exacerbated that gender gap. >> that's extraordinary when you think about it, in previous cycles before the persistent 24/7 media a comment by a senator would not have echoed through the national -- >> so whatever stupid things you say today can actually have an impact on what happens, every gathering, every fund-raiser as we saw, you know, everything is now subject to being repeated o
-working taxpayers. that the romney campaign when they talked about middle income or middle class they themselves were talking about class based politics. if you want to transcend that, hard-working taxpayers, is working class, upper middle class, it's everybody. that's just one example. there are 20 or 30 examples like that. the republican party has to learn the language of the american people if they expect to win the support of a majority of americans. >> all right frank luntz. enjoy your vacation. >> reporter: i'm not taking one. i just think the republicans need to take one. >> see you next time. some hotels give you a great deal without skimping on the experience. when we come back an expert from fodor's travel guide reveals this ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, >>> a zoo in israel two baby gorillas. one was born last week the other a couple of weeks ago. the zoo has a very successful gorilla breeding program and officials are giving credit to a male gorilla who fathered 10 offsprings in the last 15 years. >> papa is a rolling stone. very busy. welcome back. fodor's travels a lot of ground. it covers 7,500
Search Results 0 to 32 of about 33 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)